How to Choose a Therapist?
It’s one of the most common questions we receive, and one of the most difficult to answer. How do you choose the “right” therapist?
In a world full of comparison sites, star ratings, and top 10 lists, it can be tempting to approach therapy the same way you might approach buying a product. But therapy isn’t a product. It’s a relationship – and one whose affect can’t be predicted in advance.
There’s No Specialisation in the Human Psyche
Unlike many medical fields, psychotherapy doesn’t work through specialisation in symptoms. While someone might be diagnosed with anxiety, depression, an eating disorder, or trauma, these categories don’t tell us much about you – the individual who experiences them.
Symptoms are not uniform. They carry a personal history, a structure, a logic of their own – often unconscious. This is why psychoanalytic therapists are trained not to specialise in categories, but in unique people.
Can You Match Me?
In recent years, many therapy platforms have emerged offering to “match” users with the perfect therapist, often based on short questionnaires or symptom checklists. While this might sound efficient, we believe it reflects a corporate approach – one that often turns a deeply personal process into a sales funnel.
We work differently. We don’t promise perfect matches or symptom-based pairings. We begin from the idea that therapy is a unique encounter, and that what’s most transformative in treatment can’t be predicted or packaged in advance.
The Therapist You Work With Matters – But Not in the Way You Might Think
Every therapist brings their own background, style, and presence into the work. But even the most experienced therapist cannot guarantee the “right fit” in advance. That’s because the therapeutic relationship doesn’t exist until it begins.
Since every person is completely unique, it’s not something you can simulate or pre-test. You may feel understood by one therapist, and not another. Or, just as often, you may find that the therapist who unsettles you early on is the one who helps you most in the long term.
This is not random. It’s the nature of transference – the way past relationships and internal conflicts show up in the therapeutic space. That can’t be selected for. It must be discovered.
Transference
Often, what draws someone to a therapist is significant. It may be something small but (unconsciously) striking: a name, a photograph, a sentence on a website, a way of speaking, where they trained, or something they have written or said. These details can carry more weight than people realise. They may resonate with something intimate in a person’s history, even if they do not yet know why.
That is part of what makes transference so important. We are not simply choosing a professional from a list. We are often responding to something that has touched a deeper thread in us. For one person, it may be a therapist’s warmth or reserve. For another, it may be their way of thinking, their voice, or the seriousness of their presence. Someone who struggles with a stammer, for example, may find themselves especially drawn to a therapist who speaks publicly with confidence and ease. That pull is not incidental. It may say something important about identification, desire, conflict, admiration, or a question the person has about their own place in the world.
This does not mean that every attraction can be neatly decoded. It means only that these attractions matter. They may tell us something about what we are seeking, what we are repeating, or what we are hoping to find. In that sense, the choice of therapist is never purely practical. It is also subjective, and that subjectivity is often part of the work itself.
Therapy Modalities
The therapist’s modality also matters. Different forms of therapy are not simply different techniques applied to the same material. Each modality carries its own view of what a human being is, how suffering takes shape, and what change is. That has a major impact on how a therapist listens, what they attend to, and how they respond.
Some therapeutic approaches tend to stay closer to what is immediately visible, treating symptoms as discrete problems to be managed as efficiently as possible. Others take the view that a symptom cannot be fully understood in isolation, because it belongs to a wider network of experience, meaning, conflict, history, and desire.
Psychoanalysis works from this second position. It does not reduce a person to a list of issues, but approaches them as someone whose life has a structure and whose suffering has a singular logic.
For many people, this difference matters more than they first realise, and shapes whether therapy feels like a place where one is being listened to.
A Therapist’s Formation
A therapist’s formation is important, and it is worth looking into. Aside from their modality; the level of their academic and clinical experience are important. Postgraduate training, professional memberships, and regular supervision are necessary.
One fundamental of a therapist’s formation can often be overlooked – the therapist’s own personal therapy.
In psychoanalysis, personal therapy is not treated as a short requirement to be completed during college. It is a central part of becoming, and remaining, a therapist. The reason for this is simple. A therapist’s own assumptions, sensitivities, blind spots, and unresolved conflicts do not disappear just because they have qualified. Personal therapy is one of the places where this can continue to be worked on, so that the therapist is better able to listen rather than react.
Analysts often remain in their own therapy, or return to it, on a weekly basis across many years, usually across the course of a lifetime. That ongoing commitment reflects a particular ethic: that the therapist’s work on themselves is never simply finished, and that deep listening requires an equally deep formation.
Taking the First Step
Choosing a therapist isn’t about knowing everything in advance. It’s about taking a chance – often guided by an instinct we don’t yet fully understand. A sense, a pull, a feeling. Something draws us to a particular person, and we follow it.
If you’re unsure, we recommend starting a first session and seeing what takes shape. After all, the only way to know if therapy will be useful… is to begin.
More on Counselling More on Couples Counselling More on PsychotherapyRecommended Reading:
-
Freud, S. (1912). The Dynamics of Transference.
-
Lacan, J. (1966). The Direction of the Treatment and the Principles of its Power.
-
Fink, B. (1997). A Clinical Introduction to Lacanian Psychoanalysis.



